EMAIL PAGE TWO
COLUMN EIGHTY-SIX, MARCH 1, 2003
(Copyright © 2003 The Blacklisted Journalist)
DROP THE BOMB!
here's a little ditty you can all join in on...
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:12:48 -0500
From: Citizen Kafka email@example.com
been quite a while since there's been such an appropriate time and place for a
little old-fashioned song parody. Or is the word satire?
a healthy, peaceful, prosperous New Year!
the tune of 'she'll be Coming Round the Mountain?
" 2003 Citizen Kafka firstname.lastname@example.org
permission granted to distribute via e-mail, reprint,
the lefties whine about it, drop the bomb,
Commies claim they are without it, drop the bomb,
They may think that they can con us
As they smile while they disarm us
But before they drop one on us, drop the bomb!
I know they scream about me, drop the bomb,
They would love to do without me, drop the bomb,
I will show them who's a winner
As they talk of me at dinner
I can see them getting thinner, drop the bomb!
They may have their milk and honey, drop the bomb,
But they still want goods and money, drop the bomb,
Well it burns me when a border,
Lets a Commie give the order,
We don't even see a quarter- drop the bomb!
admit I have a thirst to drop the bomb
In my mind I have rehearsed to drop the bomb,
They may try to do it sooner
But right now the opportuni-
ty has come to be the first to drop the bomb!
will show them I'm a man, drop the bomb,
In the only way I can, drop the bomb,
Girls all turn me down for datin?,
All of Islam says I'm Satan,
But I'll prove my manhood great and drop the bomb!
I'll prove who's bomb is bigger, drop the bomb,
As I pull the final trigger, drop the bomb,
It won't matter then at all
If my family jewels are small
They won't have no jewels at all, drop the bomb! ##
* * *
RADIO FREQUENCY AND MIND CONTROL
Re: Phil Spector
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 10:13:20 -0800
From: "melo d" <email@example.com>
= radio frequency. "crackpots" have been associating it with covert
mind control weapons for years. I have to wonder about the human effects from
the huge build up of rf saturating an ever widening freq spectrum all around us
from satellite radio to palmtop peripherals...
* * *
IN DEFENSE OF MICHAEL JACKSON
Fw: Lay off Michael Jackson
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:26:55 -0800
From: "reg hartt" firstname.lastname@example.org
watched the Michael Jackson documentary last night. I have never been a follower
of his music. I have watched with dismay what has been happening around him.
someone who has been much interviewed by the media I do know that the vast
majority of journalists are deficient. When I saw the errors in the first piece
that appeared in print on my work I realized how completely unreliable the media
Leonardo Da Vinci were alive today he would be jailed as a pedophile.
most dramatic moment in the program, for me, was when we discovered that a
twelve-year-old boy living with Michael had been diagnosed with terminal cancer.
When he got to Jackson he had but six months to live.
learned that the cancer has gone completely into remission.
we want to look at this, this is an astounding thing.
a medical/scientific point of view what happened with that boy was impossible.
a religious point of view where we accept that the power to heal comes only from
God we have to acknowledge that God worked through Michael Jackson. If God had
not the boy would be dead.
most telling moment came when the journalist said, "Michael, you are a
forty-four year old man."
is four," said the boy.
boy had more insight, with, common sense and compassion than the host of
journalists (including Barbara Walters who has never revealed herself in public
as more shallow) combined.
know that the Jackson family had a childhood unlike the rest of us.
know that Michael Jackson was singing for thousands when he should have been
playing baseball, swimming in streams and doing his best to skip school.
far as his interior growth is concerned it stopped when he was four.
top of that he has led a life of tremendous financial success so that he has
never had to go without the things that help to shape us into adults.
is, I believe, one of the reasons why Elizabeth Taylor took him under her arm.
She was a child of the same factory that produced Michael.
however, Jackson's influence on that boy was destructive and negative the cancer
would not have been beaten.
we want to look at it a miracle happened at Jackson's NEVERLAND.
come from God.
off Michael Jackson.--Reg Hartt. ##
* * *
DOWN WITH ELITIST JOURNALISM!
Re: [Fwd: Dean]
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:57:55 EST
today's newspapers don't even cover the crime stories well
there is case out here
heir to max factor fortune on trial for rape
he has one of the premier first amended lawyers who
knows nothing of street crime the papers have not picked up on
the heir jumps bail--the papers don't realize what a
fantastic story--super rich kid---they do not interview anyone who knew
dont try to locate him--bad journalism
I blame the journalism schools like columbia the kids are so fucking
elitist they cant dig up a story worth shit
TED KENNEDY IS AGAINST THE WAR
Ted Kennedy Editorial Re: [TheNewWar] Digest Number 277
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:34:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Misterr Noisey email@example.com
a great editorial in the Globe today with Senator Kennedy's byline.
Interesting that when this "New War" group started it was about
the war on terror, not some little Hitler in the white house who stole the
election and now thinks he can be set for life grabbing oil fields.
had an interesting conference call yesterday with two rock & roll legends
and our Frank Sinatra humor shifted to talk about Bush. Wouldn't we all feel better if Al Gore was sitting in the
well, my two cents for the day.
with us, Mr. President
Edward Kennedy, 2/8/2003
POWELL has made a convincing case to the United Nations Security Council that
Saddam Hussein is a dangerous and deceptive dictator, and is concealing weapons
of mass destruction. We live in a dangerous world and Saddam must be disarmed.
question is, how to do it in a way that minimizes the risks to the American
people at home, to our armed forces, and to our allies. Even after Secretary
Powell's strong presentation, however, the president must still answer key
questions before resorting to war.
questions are obvious. It is far from clear that war is in our national interest
now. Won't war with Iraq divert the administration's attention from more
immediate and graver dangers to our security from the Al Qaeda terrorist network
and the nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula? How much support will we have
from the world community? What will be the cost in American lives, especially if
the war involves hand-to-hand, door-to-door urban combat in Baghdad?
will certainly win the war, but how do we win the peace if there are massive
civilian casualties, if factional fighting fractures Iraq, if food, water, and
medicine are in short supply and millions of Iraqis are displaced from their
homes, or if a new wave of terrorism erupts against America as an occupying
power, or because of the war itself? What if the war ignites a conflagration
that consumes other nations in the Middle East. There is no more important
decision by Congress or the president under the Constitution than the decision
to send our men and women in uniform to war.
Administration says we can fight a war in Iraq without undermining our most
pressing national security priority---the war against terrorism. But a war in
Iraq may strengthen Al Qaeda terrorists, especially if the Muslim world opposes
us. We have not broken Osama bin Laden's will to kill Americans. Our nation has
just gone on new and higher alert because of the increased overall threat from
Al Qaeda. What if Al Qaeda decides to time its next attack for the day we go to
with Iraq could swell the ranks of terrorists and trigger an escalation in
General Wesley Clark told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Sept. 23 that a
war would ''super-charge recruiting for Al Qaeda.''
are real dangers that the administration has minimized or glossed over in its
determination to attack Iraq.
within the administration, there are skeptics about the links with Iraq. CIA and
FBI analysts are clearly questioning whether there is a clear and compelling
pattern of links, and are concerned that intelligence is being politicized to
UN inspectors have found no evidence so far of a revived nuclear weapons program
in Iraq, but there is evidence in North Korea. With inspectors gone and
UN's inspectors fully understand the nature of the repressive and deceitful
regime they are dealing with, but they need more time. Why not give it to them?
We accomplished more disarmament in Iraq in seven years of inspections than we
did during the Gulf War. We are on the verge of war with Iraq because of its
weapons of mass destruction. Recently, we learned that the administration is
considering even the use of nuclear weapons against Iraq---a reckless prospect
that should set off alarm bells everywhere.
our nuclear arsenal in this unprecedented war would be the most fateful decision
since the nuclear attack on Hiroshima.
is far from clear that we will be safer by attacking Iraq. In an Oct. 7, 2002
letter to the Senate Committee on Intelligence, CIA Director George Tenet said
the probability of Saddam Hussein initiating an attack on the United States was
low. But his letter said, ''should Saddam Hussein conclude that a US-led attack
could no longer be deterred, he probably would become much less constrained in
adopting terrorist actions.''
administration must be forthcoming about the potential human costs of war with
Iraq, especially if it pushes Saddam into unleashing whatever weapons of
administration has released no casualty estimates, and they could be extremely
high. Many military experts have predicted urban guerrilla warfare---a scenario
which retired General Joseph Hoar, who had responsibility for Iraq before the
Gulf War, says could look ''like the last 15 minutes of `Saving
of dollars and years of commitment may well be needed to achieve a peaceful
postwar Iraq, but the American people still do not know how that process will
unfold and who will pay for it.
war can be successfully waged if it lacks the strong support of the American
people. Before pulling the trigger on war, the administration must tell the
M. Kennedy is the senior senator from Massachusetts.
story ran on page A15 of the Boston Globe on 2/8/2003.
" Copyright 2003 Globe Newspaper Company. ##
* * *
CLICK HERE TO GET TO INDEX OF COLUMN EIGHTY-SIX
CLICK HERE TO GET TO INDEX OF COLUMNS
Blacklisted Journalist can be contacted at P.O.Box 964, Elizabeth, NJ 07208-0964
The Blacklisted Journalist's E-Mail Address:
THE BLACKLISTED JOURNALIST IS A SERVICE MARK OF AL ARONOWITZ